MODYSSEY Release 'Can You Hear That' (타!) as Third Single
Rookie group MODYSSEY have unveiled their new title track, Can You Hear That (타!), and a review from The Bias List published on 12 October 2026 offers an early verdict. The review, written by Nick, describes the song as a mostly successful follow-up to the group's two previous releases, highlighting its electronic backdrop and strong verses while noting that the chorus does not fully deliver on its promise.
For a group with such a small discography, each new song is a crucial opportunity to define their identity. The Bias List's review frames Can You Hear That as a step in the right direction, though it also suggests that MODYSSEY still need more material to cement their sound. The overall grade of B, with an 8.5 score, reflects a positive but measured assessment that will interest anyone tracking the group's development.
A Rookie Group in a Year Light on Notable Debuts
The review opens with a reflection on 2026 as a year that has been 'very light on notable debuts,' a factor that has made the year feel underwhelming for the reviewer. In that context, MODYSSEY stand out as one of the few new acts to have caught The Bias List's attention. Before Can You Hear That, the group had only two songs to their name, making them a particularly sparse presence even among rookies.
This scarcity cuts both ways. On the one hand, it means MODYSSEY have limited material with which to build a following. On the other, it makes each release a bigger event for those already invested. The reviewer notes that both previous songs were 'very good,' which sets a high bar for the new track.
Their interest in the group suggests that early output has resonated with at least one dedicated listener, and Can You Hear That is positioned as a test of whether that promise can be sustained.
The Song's Structure: Verses Shine, Chorus Leaves Room for More
According to the review, Can You Hear That opens with a shout-chant that 'doesn't exactly bode well for its future,' but quickly settles into a more engaging verse. The electronic backdrop is singled out for praise, carrying a classic K-pop sound without tipping into what the reviewer calls the 'chintzy oontz oontz club sound' that is currently popular. The verses are described as the track's strongest moment, building anticipation for a dramatic chorus.
That chorus never quite materialises, the review argues. The first part of each chorus, with its crunchy synth and catchy hook, does land well, and the reviewer compares it to the work of NouerA, another rookie act they have been following. That comparison hints at a possible wave of new groups exploring similar electronic pop textures. However, the overall impact falls short of the promise set up by the verses.
The shout-chant returns for the post-chorus, a moment the reviewer is not a huge fan of, though they acknowledge it provides a jolt of energy.
Post-Chorus and Finale: A Mixed Bag That Builds to Something Impressive
The post-chorus shout-chant is a divisive element in the review. While it gives the track a needed energy boost, the reviewer feels there are 'far more interesting ways' to achieve that effect than simply shouting. This criticism is tempered by the observation that the song leverages the shout-chant to build toward an 'impressive finale' that brings all the elements together.
This finale appears to be a key reason the reviewer remains optimistic. They write that repeated listens will likely smooth out any initial gripes, suggesting that the song's construction rewards familiarity. That is a common pattern in K-pop, where structural quirks can become hooks over time. The review's tone here is not dismissive but hopeful, indicating that the group's approach has merit even where it does not fully connect on first listen.
For listeners who enjoy songs that reveal new details on each play, this is a point in the track's favour.
The Scorecard: High Marks for Production and Longevity
The Bias List's review includes a ratings breakdown: Hooks 8, Production 9, Longevity 9, Bias 8, resulting in an overall score of 8.5 and a grade of B. These numbers reflect the reviewer's assessment that the song's production is a major strength, and that it has strong potential to endure beyond the initial release. The lower hook score aligns with the critique of the chorus, while the bias score suggests the reviewer's personal inclination toward the group is positive but not overwhelming.
The grade of B places Can You Hear That in solid but not exceptional territory for the reviewer. It is a score that acknowledges clear strengths while leaving room for growth. For readers unfamiliar with MODYSSEY, the review functions as an introduction that highlights both what works and what could be improved. The reviewer's explicit rooting for the group adds a layer of investment that goes beyond a simple critique, and it may encourage listeners to give the song a fair chance.
What MODYSSEY Need Next: More Music to Solidify Their Sound
The review concludes that MODYSSEY are 'clearly headed in the right direction' but that they 'just need more music to solidify their sound.' This is perhaps the most significant takeaway. With only three songs now in their catalogue, the group has not yet had the chance to show the full range of their artistry or to establish a consistent sonic identity. A single title track, no matter how well received, cannot answer all the questions about a group's long-term potential.
The reviewer's call for more music is both a compliment and a challenge. It implies that the foundation is there, but that the next step is to build on it. In a competitive industry where rookies are often judged on a handful of releases, a mini-album or EP would give MODYSSEY the space to experiment and grow. Until then, Can You Hear That will serve as the latest data point in an ongoing evaluation of what the group can become.
Takeaway: A Promising Step in an Unfolding Story
The Bias List's review of Can You Hear That paints a picture of a rookie group with clear potential and a few areas to refine. The song's electronic production and durable appeal earn high marks, while the chorus and post-chorus structure leave the reviewer wanting a more inventive payoff. The overall assessment is positive, with an 8.5 score and a B grade that reflects both admiration and honest critique.
For listeners deciding whether to invest in MODYSSEY, the review offers a nuanced starting point: this is a group worth watching, but their story is far from complete. The next release will be crucial in determining whether they can turn early promise into a lasting presence. As the reviewer suggests, repeated listens may reveal more layers, but more music will be needed to fully judge their trajectory.
